<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future of Park Slope?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyslope.com/2007/03/04/the-future-of-park-slope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyslope.com/2007/03/04/the-future-of-park-slope/</link>
	<description>Community website for the Park Slope neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyslope.com/2007/03/04/the-future-of-park-slope/#comment-18230</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyslope.com/2007/03/04/the-future-of-park-slope/#comment-18230</guid>
		<description>I love knowing that I can walk down 6th Avenue and not worry about getting run over, or sworn at for being in a crosswalk with the proper right of way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love knowing that I can walk down 6th Avenue and not worry about getting run over, or sworn at for being in a crosswalk with the proper right of way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyslope.com/2007/03/04/the-future-of-park-slope/#comment-3086</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 04:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyslope.com/2007/03/04/the-future-of-park-slope/#comment-3086</guid>
		<description>4th ave idea sounds great- I have a car in the Slope, and I don't mind going a slower when I need to use it to have it look better and be more pedestrian friendly as I cross it every day leaving the subway.

As to 4th and 6th being one way: this is a well-documented way to make streets less safe and less community-friendly, according to urban planning books such as Suburban Nation.  It makes the cars go faster, and makes it more dangerous for walkers. Why would the city do this? There is no excuse. New York's lack of pedestrian friendly areas is already shocking and ridiculous compared to European and many Latin American cities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4th ave idea sounds great- I have a car in the Slope, and I don&#8217;t mind going a slower when I need to use it to have it look better and be more pedestrian friendly as I cross it every day leaving the subway.</p>
<p>As to 4th and 6th being one way: this is a well-documented way to make streets less safe and less community-friendly, according to urban planning books such as Suburban Nation.  It makes the cars go faster, and makes it more dangerous for walkers. Why would the city do this? There is no excuse. New York&#8217;s lack of pedestrian friendly areas is already shocking and ridiculous compared to European and many Latin American cities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmyfromtheblock</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyslope.com/2007/03/04/the-future-of-park-slope/#comment-2736</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmyfromtheblock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyslope.com/2007/03/04/the-future-of-park-slope/#comment-2736</guid>
		<description>Nice job with photoshop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job with photoshop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
